MAWCA 2015: STEM & Writing: The Writing Fellows Program

  • Engineering students were not revising or valuing that process
  • writing and design were about equal component of senior courses
  • Fellows participation didn’t change the course content, but small design challenges were able to scaffold the improvements for existing writing
  • literature reviews, technical writing are emphases in the Junior capstone
  • for tutors, extended relationship benefit = seeing growth over time
  • faculty looking for quantifiable change (pre/post)
  • creating video modules for Freshmen after learning about the needs of Juniors
  • separate tech experts and writing experts makes it seem easier and more credible to students
  • JMU Writing Rubric used = statistically significant results for improved learning
  • peer is not “the” expert but an expert
    • reduces burden of copyeditor/dependence
    • lacks intimidation factor
  • learning curve on the front end to norm tutor to styles, needs, and having some shared expectations
  • seniors think they know it all –> need to review value of an outside voice
  • tutor benefits
    • better know APA
    • greater exposure to projects on campus
    • teaching technical writing –> led to more and better technical writing comprehension
    • immediate feedback helps reduce anxiety
  • reading recommendation: Technical Communication in the 21st Century
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s